Which Supreme Court case ruled that a law prohibiting the use of contraception violated the right to marital privacy?

The Supreme Court case that ruled a law prohibiting the use of contraception violated the right to marital privacy is Griswold v. Connecticut. Decided in 1965, this landmark case recognized that the Constitution implicitly grants a right to privacy. The Court found that the Connecticut law that prohibited married couples from using contraceptives was an infringement on their marital privacy, which is protected under the broader concept of personal liberty.

This decision set a significant precedent in the realm of privacy rights and reproductive freedom, leading to further important cases regarding individual rights and family planning. The ruling suggested that the state should not intrude into the private decisions of married couples regarding contraception, thereby reinforcing the idea that personal choices about family and reproductive health are fundamental human rights.

In contrast, the other cases mentioned, while also significant in their own contexts, address different legal issues. Roe v. Wade dealt with abortion rights; Loving v. Virginia addressed interracial marriage; and Miranda v. Arizona focused on self-incrimination and the rights of the accused in criminal cases. These distinctions highlight the specific impact of Griswold v. Connecticut on privacy rights concerning contraception.